Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Administradores Hospitalares/psicologia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Percepção Social , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Modificador do Efeito Epidemiológico , Humanos , Liderança , PreconceitoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The hazards of surgical smoke are well documented and electrosurgical units (ESUs) are an integral part of surgical practice. The aim of this study was to gauge the opinions of general surgical consultants, specialist registrars and senior theatre nurses in the Wessex Region towards the hazards of ESU smoke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was carried out using Ovid Medline. A questionnaire was sent to 169 consultants, SpRs and nurses in the 14 hospitals across the Wessex Region, exploring current practices, perceived hazards and whether adequate precautions were currently in use. RESULTS: Only 3 of 98 surgeons used dedicated smoke extractors, despite the fact the majority (72%) felt that, currently, inadequate precautions were taken to protect staff and patients from surgical smoke. There was also uncertainty about the hazards amongst the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The use of smoke extraction equipment is very limited. Greater awareness of the hazards and available technology to extract fumes from the theatre environment might lead to greater uptake.
